Strategy

Photo by Nashara        

Leadership: Strategy & Tactics

Strategy is the creation of a unique and valuable market position supported by a system of activities that fit together in a complementary way (Porter, 1980). It is about making choices, trade-offs, and deliberately choosing to be different.

It should not be confused with operational effectiveness — what is good for everybody and what every business should be doing, e.g., performing the same activities your competitors perform, TQM, benchmarking, or being a learning organization (Porter, 1980). Thus, when developing strategies, the goal is to be different from your competitors. However, this does not mean that you are willing to do anything, but rather determine where the opportunities lie that you can best exploit.

All strategic plans need to tie in with the organization's strategic plan. That is, in going back to the definition of strategy, the leaders of the organization should create the unique and valuable market position; while your goal is to support the organization with activities that fit together in a complementary way. Now that does not mean you cannot do things differently or set your own goals. It simply means that you need to keep your leaders visions and goals in focus when setting your goals. For example, if the leaders have ethics and diversity at the forefront of their strategic vision, you cannot put elearning and knowledge management at the forefront of your strategic goals. However, that does not mean you cannot use elearning and knowledge management technologies to bring about ethical and diversity goals.

Visioning

Visioning is the start of any strategic plan. Once your leaders have set the organizational strategic plans, you need to determine how best your department can bring about changes that will support those plans. And while their strategic plan needs to be unique, you need to think along the same lines.

Visioning strategy is best performed using a four-prong approach:

Note that first three steps can be performed in just about any order; however, the last step will normally be last in the process as it is based upon the other three prongs.

Tactical

Strategies are forward-looking. They provide the guidelines for growth. With strategies, you are in reality, speaking of future performance gaps and how you are going to overcome them.

Tactical is more or less present or now-orientated. It is about present performance gaps and how you are going to overcome them in order to support the strategies.

What have you done today to enhance (or at least insure against the decline of) the relative overall useful skill level of your work force vis-à-vis competitors — Tom Peters in Thriving on Chaos

When Peters writes of “enhancing,” he is speaking of the strategic plans that will grow the employees to meet tomorrow's challenges. When he writes of “insure against the decline of,” he is speaking of the tactical impediments that are presently challenging employees from meeting expected performance standards. In order to grow, you must be able to ward off present roadblocks. Thus, tactical plans are about providing performance stability so that change may take affect for growth.

Strategies normally look an average of about six years into the future (with a range of about one to ten years). Tactics look ahead just far enough to secure objectives set by strategy. Thus, tactics are characterized by adroitness, ingenuity, or skill. Note that tactics is from the Greek taktika — matters pertaining to arrangement. On the other hand, strategy has its roots in “office of a General” or “to lead”).

Command & Control

There are four basic functions used within organizations to achieve their visions and goals: Command, Control, Leadership, and Management:

1. Command — forming and imparting visions:

2. Leadership — achieving visions through people:

3. Management — implementing processes for achieving the visions:

4. Control — ensuring resources went where they were supposed to go:

With Control and Management the ultimate goal is efficiency — addressing how well the process was accomplished (form); while with Command and Leadership the ultimate goal is effectiveness— achieving goals and mission (results). Generally, to achieve “form,” one must conceptualize “processes”; while to achieve “results,” one must conceptualize “tasks.”

Thus, command and leadership decide what the organization should be doing, while control and management ensure that the resources used to achieve the results are used efficiently (without waste).

Frameworks of Command & Control

Command and Leadership use the following framework:

Related to the Command & Control framework is OODA.

Control and Management uses the following framework:

Next Steps

Leadership and Visioning

Main Leadership Menu

References

Collins, E. and Devanna, M. (1990). The Portable MBA. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy, Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.

U.S. Army (1987). Leadership and Command at Senior Levels. FM 22-103.